It’s time to keep the heat on Bill English
by Jeremy Greenbrook-Held
While I am grateful for Jake’s kind offer for me to share his blog, I’m afraid I’m going to take this opportunity to disagree with his earlier post.
It’s time for Bill English to go. Yes, there are much more important issues at hand, which is why English must be stood down, sacked, removed – whatever – from his Ministerial portfolios, in particular as Minister of Finance. He’s under investigation from the auditor general. He’s a distraction, he’s lost a lot of credibility. As long as he sits on National’s front bench, he provides Labour with a stick to hit the government with. At this time of economic crisis, New Zealand needs a strong Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister – English is no longer is that position. Time for a reshuffle, John, and the first person to go has to be the guy sitting next to you.
What annoys me more than anything else is the development of a ‘Poor Bill’ syndrome (as our friends at the Standard have so appropriately put it). We’re supposed to feel sorry because his family will have to move back to Dipton, and we’re somehow questioning his roots in the deep South. And (astoundingly) the system has let HIM down. No one is suggesting for a moment that the English’s should have to move back to Dipton – I can understand his desire to have his family living closer to him. And I actually think his ancestral connection (and obvious pride) in the deep South is admirable – I wish my MP had the same connection to his electorate – actually, any connection would be nice.
The problem is that English changed the status of the trust which owned his family home in Karori so he was no longer a beneficiary , in order to claim a higher living allowance when he became a Minister. He then paid the money back – as Trevor Mallard points out, how can Bill English have paid money back that was paid to a trust which he had no interest in?
I’m pretty sure English isn’t the only MP (or Minister) that has used trusts to claim more in terms accommodation allowances. However, he is the Minister of Finance and is calling on spending with-straint in the public sector, which is resulting in pay freezes and redundancies, while his living allowance increased by more than the average wage.
I would have thought that John Key would regard this situation for a Senior Cabinet Minister as a liability, and would throw Bill English overboard – just as he did to Richard Worth. Let’s see how many more questions from the opposition that Key will have to field before this happens.
agreed Jeremy
Oh yes, how principled of you Jeremy. Partisan game playing, and you’re all for it. of course, Labour was as white as driven snow in this regard, weren’t they.
Oh, indeed – what a shame we cannot focus on bigger economic issues. Could that be because the likes of you and Hodgson are doing your very best to play this for as long as you can? Of course not! What great value to add!
Another young labourite uses his blog to say the same thing as the labour party. Not really an original angle, is it. So what is it that you offer again?
Jeremy you are borderline on committing defamation. If Bill English were a private citizen not in Parliament and therefore you were not subject to the discretionary privilege granted media with regard to elected member of parliament (Lange v Atkinson) it would certainly be arguable.
Saying he changed his status from being a beneficiary to a non-beneficiary is a very incriminating statement when he didn’t. That is a serious serious misstatement of fact and journalistic standards Mr Greenbrook-Held.
Quick answer to Mallards question. Bill pays out of his own pocket dollars to the same value as what was paid to the trust in which he never had a pecuniary interest. He does this in order to correct what is an incorrect perception as he states. This is all separate from the trust and pretty straightforward.
Good on you Jake Quinn. I will certainly be reading your material more often, that was a good balanced report. You acknowledged he will be damaged over this, and he will be a little bit given the perception, but it will not be fatal to the National party agenda.
[…] earlier posted that Bill English should go. I personally still believe he should be removed, but any legal grounds for him to be removed have […]